Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

(DOWNLOAD) "Chro v. Truelove and Maclean" by Supreme Court of Connecticut # eBook PDF Kindle ePub Free

Chro v. Truelove and Maclean

📘 Read Now     📥 Download


eBook details

  • Title: Chro v. Truelove and Maclean
  • Author : Supreme Court of Connecticut
  • Release Date : January 24, 1996
  • Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
  • Pages : * pages
  • Size : 66 KB

Description

This appeal principally concerns the applicability of the remedies provided by various general antidiscrimination statutes in the context of discriminatory employment practices. The claimant, Kristine A. Jennings, filed with the commission on human rights and opportunities (commission) a complaint alleging that her former employer, the defendant, Truelove and Maclean, Inc., 1 had discriminated against her because of her pregnancy. After a public hearing, a commission hearing officer determined that the defendant had engaged in discriminatory employment practices, and awarded the claimant disability insurance benefits and damages for emotional distress. The trial court dismissed an appeal brought by the commission on behalf of the claimant, in which she sought additional relief, and granted the motion of the defendant to vacate the award of damages for emotional distress. The claimant and the commission appealed from the judgment of the trial court to the Appellate Court, and [238 Conn Page 339] we transferred the appeal to this court pursuant to Practice Book § 4023 and General Statutes § 51-199 (c). We affirm the judgment of the trial court. The following undisputed facts are relevant to this appeal. In March, 1981, the claimant began her full-time employment with the defendant. In November, 1984, due to fatigue and back strain caused by her pregnancy, the claimant considered herself incapable of effectively performing the duties and responsibilities associated with her employment. Accordingly, she spoke with the defendant's personnel manager to request a leave of absence. The personnel manager informed the claimant that the defendant had no policy that allowed for pregnancy disability leave and that the defendant would not allow such a leave of absence. 2 The defendant's treasurer similarly informed the claimant that the defendant could not provide a leave of absence under the circumstances. When the claimant asked whether she could return to work for the defendant after the birth of her child, the personnel manager informed her that she would have to reapply for a position and that she would receive consideration if a position were available. Although the defendant invited the claimant to reapply, it did not guarantee her reemployment. Nonetheless, the defendant maintained that it would have favorably considered the claimant for any vacant position if she had reapplied because, as the defendant's personnel manager testified, she had been a good employee.


Ebook Download "Chro v. Truelove and Maclean" PDF ePub Kindle